Writing a literature review is an important aspect of your college life as it teaches you a new skill set. Though every student possesses basic writing skills, yet not all college students can compose good work as it requires advanced skills and a deeper understanding of the piece that is about to be acknowledged. There are several literature review examples that will give you an idea of how scholarly your approach should be while writing a literature review and how current it should be compared to the other studies in the similar field.

However, a literature review is not necessarily an analysis or critique of a drama, novel, or poetry it could be a summarization of significant information of sources but in a certain pattern giving it a completely new meaning and relevance to modern studies. It may also be an attempt to track down the intellectual journey of a specific field of study that may have stirred heavy debates in time. Most graduate students get confused by the apparent meaning and think that writing a review of some literature is explaining a text. However, there are sites that exhibit good explanatory literature review examples for you to have a clear idea of how to write a literature review.

Moreover, graduate students should familiarize with the idea, as they will be required to know this genre in order to display a scholarly approach in their dissertation. Do not worry – this article will mention all the ways and support you need in learning how to write a literature review.

Top three rules to writing an amazing literature review:

Rule #1

The first rule of how to write a literature review is to completely understand the piece you are about to write on because until absolute awareness of the topic you will not be able to convince readers that your argument joins the conversation of other existing works. And most importantly, you should remember that your readers are not ordinary people but learned scholars and you cannot scam them. For this kind of writing needs, special skills and only professional Edusson writers of a certain caliber are able to pull off a successful manuscript.

This knowledge builds a lot of legit pressure on graduates and they develop anxiety, though it will not help. Reliable support from a mentor or an online source may be very helpful. You may want to browse through a few legit sites like edusson.com reviews to view some of the example papers to get a clear idea. Remember literature review is not your average academic paper in which you are required to build an argument and analyze deducing a comprehensive conclusion. On the other hand, literature reviews should present a summary and synthesize the ideas and debates of other scholars without adding any new contributions. Edusson reviews meet all these needs.

Rule #2

The second most important thing is to study all background on the relevant piece you are about to write for. Cheating your readers into thinking that you know the piece is not possible, so instead of trying to scam your way into the list of scholars spend some quality time reading the background of the project under question. Writing a literature review is a legitimate intervention in some already acknowledged scholar's conversation and demands a lot of genuine effort even the professional writers at Edusson take their time to compose a paper that gets appreciation and acknowledgment. There is a thorough process of evaluation and analysis of the research. A successful writer is the one who is not only able to summarize the main point of the said scholar in a clear and plausible manner but to build a further argument by joining in with other relevant current studies.

Rule #3

After showing the readers that you fully understand the scholarly conversations you now need to build your position and stance on the whole thing. According to the writers at Edusson, this is the most complicated stage of composing this document because it demands an eloquent reason explaining why your work is required on the selected piece. In doing so, you should avoid cheating by copying other ideas, which are also a crime and try to produce legit evaluation by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of said work in relevance to yours. If you are able to develop a thesis that fills the hollow spaces in existing scholar's work your paper will be considered a success and will get online orders for copies from around the world.

Top three things you should avoid:

#1

Plagiarizing and stating others work even if it is unpublished because if you do so you will pay a very heavy price that may include legal action. In addition, it is important to choose only current sources that support your evaluation, quoting a source that has become irrelevant is cheating with your readers. Some writers also miss tiny details like year or month, it is important to quote the complete date of the source, if you are unsure and could not find complete details, leave that source and find a new one. It is better than maliciously scamming your readers into believing that you quoted recent date by omitting year. Only reliable work with complete sources is used and quoted for future projects.

#2

Do not spread your evaluation too much. Keeping it narrow will not only help you but will also be more interesting for your scholarly readers. All legal findings have narrow scope enabling the author to use most reliable and recent works, while those with greater radius paid heavy prices at times.

#3

Organize each part as an independent entity. Although these documents have their own structure that you are supposed to follow, at times the length and complexity drift the focus of author's attention from it and in turn a valuable piece of evaluation fall victim to disorganization.