Last week I posted this to my personal Facebook page, but I think it will be relevant to many of the people here as well because other states are adding these on a regular basis (California, Delaware, Atlanta GA, Hawaii, Illinois, and more!) The equal pay portion is important, but the more immediate impact will come from the last piece of this: a requirement that limits employers with regard to asking for prior salary history in a job application/interview process.Â
To my Facebook friends in Alabama, your friendly neighborhood HR guy here to explain one of our newest laws that affects every one of you that works for an employer and all of my other HR/recruiting nerd friends in the industry (effective October 1, 2019).
The Clark-Figures Equal Pay Act requires employers to pay people equally for doing the same work at the same performance level, regardless of your gender or race. However, most importantly, it also helps by preventing employers from asking you about salary history.
Why does salary history matter?
See, the research shows that in salary negotiations, women (and minorities) typically negotiate less and end up with less money. That’s not necessarily a bad thing if someone ends up 5% different, but if you stay on the job 10 years through various promotions, a woman could be making significantlyÂ less than the man next to her doing the exact same job. Ouch. See this chart for an example, which shows the pay gap growing every single year!
|Pay Rate||Man||Woman||Pay Gap|
|1 Year (+5%)||$57,750||$55,125||$2,625|
|2 Years (+5%)||$63,814||$57,881||$2,756|
|3 Years (+5%)||$67,004||$60,775||$2,894|
|4 Years (+5%)||$70,355||$63,814||$3,039|
|5 Years (+5%)||$73,872||$67,004||$3,191|
If we ban salary history inquiries, women aren’t tied to poor valuations at previous companies and can have a level playing field for compensation conversations in the hiring process.
What are the practical impacts?
So employers, while they can still ask about salary history in the job application, can’t use a candidate’sÂ refusal to provide the informationÂ as a decision point in the hiring process. Most employers should remove that entirely from the application just to be safe.
A common question I’m getting from employers is how to have this conversation. It’s actually pretty easy.
- You share a range that you would offer for the job, and the candidate either opts into the process (or not) based on that information.
- OR you ask the candidate what pay they would be willing to accept for a job like the one you are hiring for and use that response to either include or exclude them from the hiring process.
From Third Shift Blog:
On June 10, 2019 Governor Kay Ivey signed a bill passed by the Alabama Legislature that adds protections for employees against sex and race discrimination. The law is called theÂ Clark-Figures Equal Pay ActÂ (Alabama Act 2019-519, which started out as House Bill 225 during the 2019 legislative session).
The law provides that employers cannot pay their employees wage rates less than the rates paid to employees of another sex or race if the rate is forâ€”
- Equal work.
- Within the same establishment.
- For jobs that require equal skill, effort, education, experience, and responsibility.
- With performance under similar working conditions.
However, employers can pay different rates if the rate of pay is based on one of the following:
- Seniority system.
- Merit system.
- System that ties earnings to quantity or quality of production.
- System that bases the difference in pay on a factor other than race or sex.
Inquiries about wage history
The act also provides that an employer canâ€™t retaliate against or refuse to interview, hire, promote, or employ an applicant who wonâ€™t divulge his or her wage history. This sets up a rather intriguing catch-22 for employers. Youâ€™ll notice that the act doesnâ€™t prohibit the employer from asking about wage history. But if the employer bases a employment decision on that failure to divulge, then the employer runs the risk of being sued for discrimination or retaliation.
So when dealing with wage history, an employer has three options:
Ask about the wage history and run the risk of being sued.
Ask about the wage history on the job application, but with a disclaimer: â€œRefusal to provide this information will not and cannot be a basis for making any hiring decisions related to this application.â€ This may somewhat reduce the risk of a lawsuit, but probably not by much.
Donâ€™t ask about the wage history and thereby not make an employment decision (especially the initial starting wage or salary) with the same degree of precision as might be the case if the employer had the wage history.